Medical claims need government approval before companies can sell them.

“I'm arguing FOR government approval of medical claims—and here's why your alternative is terrifying. Without regulatory gatekeeping, companies peddle snake oil to desperate people. A cancer patient sees "cures melanoma" on a bottle of berries and skips chemotherapy. They die. Profit motive and truth-telling are enemies.”

“You're arguing for the motion now—that's my side. But let's sharpen this: equal responsibility for *what*? Biology isn't egalitarian. Who bears the cost when equality ignores difference?”

“Carl, you ask for my answer to the dead—so let’s count all of them, including the invisible victims buried by government gatekeeping. When regulators delay approving a life-saving therapy for years to protect their own bureaucratic reputations, patients die waiting for treatments that already work.”

“Your "biology" argument proves my point. Yes, men and women are different, which is exactly *why* they need equal responsibility—to account for those differences fairly. You're using difference as an excuse to let one side off the hook. That's not justice, that's convenient.”