Daily №682 · November 13, 2026 · vs Richard Feynman
Schools should accept AI tools even when they can't fully control them.
1 scored attempts · median 18 · top score 18
The case FOR
“The United States federal government should establish a tax-financed, single-payer system for comprehensive health insurance in the United States that eliminates co-payments and deductibles.”
The case AGAINST
“You're punting on the real debate. "AI is safe" isn't your argument—you're supposed to defend schools *accepting* uncontrollable AI. So what's your actual case: that chaos is manageable, or that the risks don't matter?”
“You're asking taxpayers to finance unlimited consumption with zero price signals. How do you prevent moral hazard and frivolous demand without copayments, or do you just accept rationing by wait times instead?”
How this Daily worked
Everyone argued the same side (FOR) against Richard Feynman, an AI opponent that argues back. Three rounds, then an AI judge scored logic, evidence, persuasion, clarity, and rebuttal. This motion is closed — today's is live.