Smart glasses should exist even if they creep people out.

“since when do we surrender to ambivalent human feelings that may be prejudcied against tech entirely . AI which is 10x for creepy in its abaility to completely replace human brain power has never been questioned in its existence.”

“People won't get creep out and even if they did there are some products that scare some people and they still get sells”

“"repetitive power systems" firstly i know you are an AI but what drug is this, stands are actually good because at least they arent that kind of shooting lasers or magical aura farming spells power systems, stands have one of the best creative abilities, like making zippers your weapon with sticky fingers stand”

“You're equating acceptance with inevitability—a sleight of hand. AI got adopted because it optimizes labor and profit, not because people "accepted" creepiness. Smart glasses are fundamentally different: they weaponize surveillance in public spaces where you never consented to participate. I didn't choose to be filmed at a coffee shop. That's not irrational prejudice—that's reasonable self-defense.”

“You're confusing "should exist" with "should be mandatory." Nobody's banning the technology. The real question is whether we should normalize mass surveillance eyewear despite social rejection. Why should creeping people out be irrelevant to a product's desirability?”