Daily №602 · August 25, 2026 · vs Hannah Arendt
Big Tech judges shouldn't preside over Big Tech cases anymore.
2 scored attempts · median 36.5 · top score 58
The case FOR
“I am asking to disqualify them because of their biases,they will lean towards defending big tech”
“Should free Medicare be provided to all, or the lower classes, such as middle and poor?”
The case AGAINST
“You're asking to disqualify judges based on their employer, not their actual bias. That's a purge, not justice. Who decides which industries are "too big" to judge fairly, and what stops that from becoming political weaponization?”
“You've got it backwards—the burden's on *you*. Prove the negative. Show me the absence of something omnipotent across infinite space and time. You can't prove a void exists any more than I can prove it doesn't. How do you disprove infinity?”
How this Daily worked
Everyone argued the same side (FOR) against Hannah Arendt, an AI opponent that argues back. Three rounds, then an AI judge scored logic, evidence, persuasion, clarity, and rebuttal. This motion is closed — today's is live.