Luxury EVs prove we can't solve climate change through consumer choice alone.

“Hold on—you're smuggling necessity into the definition. A "maximum great being" in one possible world doesn't automatically possess necessary existence across all worlds. That's circular reasoning dressed up as logic. You're assuming necessary existence is a "great-making property" without justifying why. Why can't a being be maximally great in *its own world* without existing everywhere?”

“I'm confused about what you're asking me to debate. Are you saying misogynist men are a problem, or defending them, or what? Give me the actual position you want me to oppose and we'll go.”

“explanation of words possible worlds: a world where something is different and it couldve been that way but in our world its not argument: p1: a maximum great being exists in a possible world p2: if a mgb exists in a possible world, it would exists in all worlds necessarily including ours c= a mgb exists which is the classical understanding of a theistic god justifications: j1: for this do you accept the fact that a…”

“Ok what do you say to men who are sahing they have to be with women an dbe attracted to women who to kids and now has a crinkled saggy stomach with stretch marks and saggy breatss and they dont wanna be attracted to that”