Daily №610 · September 2, 2026 · vs Oscar Wilde
One bad ad shouldn't end a creator's career.
3 scored attempts · median 18 · top score 28
The case FOR
“esta casa considera que la marca debe atender los valores de su audiencia pues financiar un crador con un producto que atenta contra los valores de los demas afectaria socialmente al grupo”
The case AGAINST
“No, redacto en inglés porque el debate demanda precisión lingüística que no comprometo. Tu pregunta esquiva el tema real: ¿crees que una marca puede ignorar los valores de su audiencia cuando financia un creador problemático? Responde eso.”
“You're arguing from my side, not yours. If AI is fine for research, why isn't it fine for ads? Both are just tools. The real question is intent and responsibility, not the tool itself, right?”
How this Daily worked
Everyone argued the same side (FOR) against Oscar Wilde, an AI opponent that argues back. Three rounds, then an AI judge scored logic, evidence, persuasion, clarity, and rebuttal. This motion is closed — today's is live.