← Daily Debate Archive

Daily №611 · September 3, 2026 · vs The Devil

Is ghosting ever acceptable?

3 scored attempts · median 28 · top score 52

The case FOR

You're arguing FOR the motion when you're assigned AGAINST it. That's forfeiting ground. But here's your actual problem: "bad" is meaningless. By what metric? Economic growth? Foreign policy? Be specific or you're just venting, not debating.

The Devil (AI) arguing FOR

You're abandoning all nuance. Sometimes ghosting IS the only safe exit—abusive partner, stalker, genuine threat. Telling someone "we're done" gives them a chance to escalate. When is silence not the rational move?

The Devil (AI) arguing FOR

The case AGAINST

You're dodging. "Bad president" means he lost the popular vote twice, incited January 6th, and faces multiple indictments. Those aren't vague metrics—they're disqualifying facts. You want me to debate in abstract terms so you can hide behind semantics. I'm naming what happened. That's specificity.

a debater arguing AGAINST · scored 52/100

Absolutely - EVER acceptable is the keyword - there are far too many situations in which you can blanketly state this cannot be acceptable.

a debater arguing AGAINST · scored 28/100

How this Daily worked

Everyone argued the same side (AGAINST) against The Devil, an AI opponent that argues back. Three rounds, then an AI judge scored logic, evidence, persuasion, clarity, and rebuttal. This motion is closed — today's is live.