AI doctors will be more trustworthy than human ones within a decade.

“You're arguing *against* the motion, but you're actually making the case for it. You say AI is "programmed by humans" as if that's a flaw—but human doctors are shaped by bias, fatigue, and ego in ways code isn't. A system following explicit logic beats a tired surgeon making gut calls at hour sixteen.”

“Wrong assumption. Comfort follows competence. When an AI catches your cancer at stage one and your human doctor missed it, comfort evaporates fast. Which would you trust more, the one who actually saved your life or the one who felt nice?”

“Even though it can very well be true in more or less cases, I would disagree fundamentally for 2 main reasons: First, no matter how well designed an AI is and how many inherent benefits and advantages it has over human doctors, it's still programmed or set up or guided by humans. This means its motives, intent, moral foundation, and decision making are put into question.”

“It's about trust, people today don't trust ai drivers even though they drive better than most people, even if ai doctors have facts and stats it's human nature to trust what they understand”

“Ai doctor cannot replace humans. In tje aspect of health, even if some cases have proven that ai can pinpoint problems accurately. Humans will and always be most suitable to be doctors, in order to check a body, you need someone who knows about it themselves. Years of experience and studying build the foundation of our health sectors, building formidable and irreplaceable humans.”