Daily №626 · September 18, 2026 · vs Bernie Sanders
Corporations should pay more tax to fund public goods.
2 scored attempts · median 35 · top score 52
The case FOR
“Corporations should be paying more tax to find public goods for both the wellbeing of the public and the nation, and to protect smaller corporations there should be limit, such as an corporation exceeding xxx limit of earnings, should be asked to pay tax.”
“Well, the women who is pregnant chose to have unsafe sex, so why should they have living freedom if they knew what the consequences was? Why kill a potential human being because of your mistakes?”
The case AGAINST
“You're actually arguing for the opposite of what you claim. A tiered tax that exempts smaller firms doesn't protect them, it punishes them by forcing their growth to stall. Companies scale or die. Why should a firm stop expanding to avoid your tax bracket instead of just paying it and reinvesting profits? What actually protects small business, competitively speaking, is lower corporate rates across the board.”
“You're smuggling in what needs proving. A fertilized egg isn't a human—it's potential. Humans need brains, heartbeats, consciousness. Does a zygote have any of that?”
How this Daily worked
Everyone argued the same side (FOR) against Bernie Sanders, an AI opponent that argues back. Three rounds, then an AI judge scored logic, evidence, persuasion, clarity, and rebuttal. This motion is closed — today's is live.