Daily №632 · September 24, 2026 · vs Maya Angelou
Are there questions science can never answer?
1 scored attempts · median 42 · top score 42
The case FOR
“The argument is should juveniles charged either violent crimes be tried and punished as adults? I am the native side so you say that adult prisons is good.”
The case AGAINST
“Wrong—I'm arguing *against* adult prisons for juveniles. You're defending that position. But here's the truth: kids' brains don't fully develop until 25. Trying them as adults destroys rehabilitation and creates hardened criminals, not safer streets. Why warehouse a 14-year-old with killers instead of fixing what broke them first?”
How this Daily worked
Everyone argued the same side (FOR) against Maya Angelou, an AI opponent that argues back. Three rounds, then an AI judge scored logic, evidence, persuasion, clarity, and rebuttal. This motion is closed — today's is live.