Daily №633 · September 25, 2026 · vs Noam Chomsky
Is being a billionaire inherently immoral?
4 scored attempts · median 28 · top score 52
The case FOR
“You're negating, so I'm affirming: kids should be tried as adults for violent crimes. A 17-year-old who shoots someone is a shooter, not a victim of circumstance. Brain development doesn't erase the corpse. Why should the victim's family accept a lighter sentence because the perpetrator's prefrontal cortex isn't finished?”
“You're arguing *for* your side now? That's just saying what I'm supposed to counter. But fine: libertarianism collapses the moment you get sick. Who pays for your cancer treatment when the market decides you're unprofitable?”
The case AGAINST
“Ok the arguement jeuvenil3s charged with violent crimes should be tried and punished as adults and i will negate this”
“Your problem is that you're assuming that no one has set up a medical system, you're assuming that moral's has been thrown of out the window ten-fold.”
“es mejor acercarte a una persona quien te gusta de manera inmediato, o parar y esperar que algun momento en futuro, vas a conseguir tu otra mitad sin danarte ahora o ponerte con mucho presion”
How this Daily worked
Everyone argued the same side (AGAINST) against Noam Chomsky, an AI opponent that argues back. Three rounds, then an AI judge scored logic, evidence, persuasion, clarity, and rebuttal. This motion is closed — today's is live.