All Topics

Motion · Technology & AI

Should students be allowed to use AI for homework?

A case for

I think that students should be allowed to use AI for homework because, when used properly, it functions as a personalized tutor that improves understanding for students, gives immediate feedback, and it even prepares students for a world where AI is an increasingly important tool, used by most in today's society. The solution to misuse is teaching responsible AI use, not banning the tool.

The first objection

Your "personalized tutor" claim collapses the moment a student outsources thinking instead of using AI to scaffold it. You've conflated two completely different activities: learning *with* AI versus learning *from* AI doing the work. Immediate feedback means nothing if the student never struggles to earn it. And "preparing for a world with AI" is circular—we don't let surgeons skip anatomy because scalpels exist. The real question you're dodging: how do you enforce "responsible use" when the incentive structure rewards shortcuts? Your solution assumes enforcement that doesn't exist.

2 selected cases on record

Choose the opposition

Cases on record

vs Devil's advocate · 6w ago

78–72

Human opening

I think that students should be allowed to use AI for homework because, when used properly, it functions as a personalized tutor that improves understanding for students, gives immediate feedback, and it even prepares students for a world where AI is an increasingly important tool, used by most in today's society. The solution to misuse is teaching responsible AI use, not banning the tool.

First rebuttal

Your "personalized tutor" claim collapses the moment a student outsources thinking instead of using AI to scaffold it. You've conflated two completely different activities: learning *with* AI versus learning *from* AI doing the work. Immediate feedback means nothing if the student never struggles to earn it. And "preparing for a world with AI" is circular—we don't let surgeons skip anatomy because scalpels exist. The real question you're dodging: how do you enforce "responsible use" when the incentive structure rewards shortcuts? Your solution assumes enforcement that doesn't exist.

Read the full case →

vs Devil's advocate · 10w ago

78–68

Human opening

While many consider artificial intelligence as a productive tool, I don't think that students should be allowed to use it for homework. You see, students can have an incentive to minimize effort, especially when the goal is as simple as finishing a worksheet. And if an AI can easily produce a finished answer instantly, asking it to explain the material requires more effort than asking it to do the work. Therefore, if AI is permitted for homework, there is a strong incentive to use it as an answer generator rather than as a learning tool. That suggests that AI isn't actually helping students, it's hurting them. I mean, if students just use AI to do the work for them, how do you expect them to build cognitive skills, learning abilities, and strong work ethics for their future?

First rebuttal

Your entire argument rests on a false choice: that students either use AI as a crutch or don't use it at all. But here's what you're missing. The incentive problem you describe exists with every tool, every textbook, every teacher. Lazy students will cheat with or without AI. The real question isn't whether AI tempts shortcuts, it's whether banning it actually prevents anything. You're treating symptoms instead of addressing root causes. If cognitive skill-building is your actual concern, why not demand better assessment methods instead of pretending prohibition works?

Read the full case →

Adjacent motions