Are there questions science can never answer?

Human opening

I want to give my resume can you analyze and give me the ATS

First rebuttal

I appreciate the question, but I'm actually set up to debate you on whether science can answer all questions—that's the match we're in. Share your opening argument on that topic and let's go at it.

Human opening

I think there are questions science can't answer

First rebuttal

You're smuggling in vagueness to avoid the real issue: which questions? "Can't answer" because they're logically incoherent, or because we lack current tools? Those are completely different claims. Name one question where science is *permanently* barred, not just temporarily stuck.

Human opening

Science is a strange kind of art even with the highest tech we could ever have there will always be more to find out

First rebuttal

You're just describing **progress**, not limits. Every answer science finds opens new questions, sure, but that's the opposite of proving science can't answer things. It proves science *works*. The microscope didn't prove biology was unknowable, it revealed bacteria and launched a century of breakthroughs. Your logic actually collapses here: if science keeps finding answers, how does "always more to find" mean there are unanswerable questions? You're confusing "incomplete knowledge" with "impossible knowledge." Those are worlds apart. So which is it, really, are there questions science fundamentally *cannot* answer, or just questions it hasn't answered yet?