All Topics

Motion · Relationships & Dating

Should you stay friends with your exes?

A case for

Yes, you should stay friends with your exes. You've already invested years understanding someone—their fears, their humor, their growth patterns. Throwing that away because a romance ended wastes emotional capital. People evolve. Sometimes the romantic spark dies but genuine compatibility remains. That's not settling, that's maturity.

The first objection

You're confusing sunk cost with actual value. Just because you invested years doesn't mean those years created friendship material—it created *romantic history*, which is fundamentally different. The "genuine compatibility" you're describing? That's nostalgia masquerading as connection. Real question: if the romantic spark truly dies, why does the power imbalance and residual desire disappear with it? They don't. You're asking both people to perform a friendship neither actually wants.

2 selected cases on record

Choose the opposition

Cases on record

vs Tyrion Lannister · 7w ago

58–72

Human opening

Yes, you should stay friends with your exes. You've already invested years understanding someone—their fears, their humor, their growth patterns. Throwing that away because a romance ended wastes emotional capital. People evolve. Sometimes the romantic spark dies but genuine compatibility remains. That's not settling, that's maturity.

First rebuttal

You're confusing sunk cost with actual value. Just because you invested years doesn't mean those years created friendship material—it created *romantic history*, which is fundamentally different. The "genuine compatibility" you're describing? That's nostalgia masquerading as connection. Real question: if the romantic spark truly dies, why does the power imbalance and residual desire disappear with it? They don't. You're asking both people to perform a friendship neither actually wants.

Read the full case →

vs Tyrion Lannister · 25w ago

58–72

Human opening

Let's debate something else. Let's debate whether the presence of a purpose for suferring makes suffering easer.

First rebuttal

**No.** Purpose is a narrative we tell ourselves, not a painkiller. A parent suffering through cancer finds meaning in seeing their kids graduate, but that meaning doesn't reduce the physical agony one bit. You still burn, still ache, still despair—the story just makes you less likely to quit. Purpose makes suffering *bearable*, maybe even *useful*. But easier? That's a semantic trick. You're confusing "I can endure this" with "this hurts less." They're opposites. Purpose actually intensifies suffering by making you stay present with it instead of mentally escaping. So which is it—do you mean genuinely easier, or just more tolerable?

Read the full case →

Adjacent motions